• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:00:48 -0500

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:54 AM, David Carlisle <davidc@n...> wrote:

> The trouble is that HTML5 parsers will parse a large subset of XML but
> produce radically different parse trees, leading to silent data corruption.
>

Really? Is that deliberate? I thought one of the goals of HTML 5 was
to make sure parsers reported the same parse tree no matter what
garbage you threw at it.


-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@i...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • MicroXML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: MicroXML
    • From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>
  • XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: rjelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>