• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
• Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:17:17 +0000

On 14/12/2010 13:00, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> Really? Is that deliberate? I thought one of the goals of HTML 5 was
> to make sure parsers reported the same parse tree no matter what
> garbage you threw at it.

same parse trees as other html5 parsers yes, but radically different 
trees than an XML parser would produce from the same markup.

I've no complaint with html5 having defined fixup rules to give 
consistent error recovery from overlapping markup and other horrors, but 
I think the fact that it parses well formed XML and produces different 
trees is just wrong.

David




________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: rjelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>

• References:
  • MicroXML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: MicroXML
    • From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>
  • XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: rjelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>