• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Elliotte Rusty Harold'" <elharo@i...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:28:47 +0100

> 
> No, I don't think that's sufficient. FDTDs are fundamentally 
> integrated into the design of an XML parser. They are not 
> optional pieces one can ignore. Nor are they just a schema 
> language either.


For the average reader of this article, DTDs and XSDs are equally likely to
be important (or unimportant) to them.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 

• References:
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • RE: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>