[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@a...>
  • To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:37:16 +0200

Michael Kay schrieb:
>> I suggest we add a section on DTDs and validity rather than
>> merging it in with other schema languages. For better or
>> worse--probably worse, the XML specs do specially preference
>> DTDs over other schema languages.
>
> A better approach might be to treat DTDs in the structure of the
> article as co-equal with other schema languages, and mention in the
> prose that for historical reasons they are given a special status in
> the XML recommendation. That's a better reflection of the reality of
> usage.

All schemas are equal, but the DTD is more equal than others. (XML Farm)

-- 
Michael Ludwig


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member