• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Elliotte Rusty Harold'" <elharo@i...>,"'Tim Bray'" <Tim.Bray@s...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:42:40 +0100

> I suggest we add a section on DTDs and validity rather than 
> merging it in with other schema languages. For better or 
> worse--probably worse, the XML specs do specially preference 
> DTDs over other schema languages.

A better approach might be to treat DTDs in the structure of the article as
co-equal with other schema languages, and mention in the prose that for
historical reasons they are given a special status in the XML
recommendation. That's a better reflection of the reality of usage.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@a...>
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>

• References:
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>