[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • To: 'Jim Tivy' <jimt@b...>, Tim.Bray@S...,'Dave Pawson' <davep@d...>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:20:27 +0100

> People say the text <a/> *is* XML but more precisely it *is* 
> a "document"
> that comples with the "a" markup language which in turn 
> complies with the rules of XML.

There may be millions of markup languages that allow <a/> as a document, or
there may be none. It doesn't matter: <a/> is a well-formed XML document
regardless. I think this stuff about XML being used to define other markup
languages is a very confusing way of explaining things to newcomers. The
first thing to get across is that <a/> is (a document allowed by the rules
of) XML.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member