Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 09/08/09 11:38, Pete Cordell wrote: > Original Message From: "Tim Bray" > >> I think that's accurate but it feels kind of long and klunky. Anyone got >> any polish to apply? -T > > > Here's another bid: I like the approach, not quite 50,000 feet, but pretty high. (I think it still needs Tims 'one liner' for what is XML in addition to this) > Although originally designed to represent documents with associated > mark-up, > XML's use has expanded to include representing computer languages and > arbitrary data. +3. good point Pete. Or does this presume the reader assumes XML was for representing documents? Lens and Mike Kays point well taken on my part. > > Other specifications in the XML family define languages for manipulating > XML > (XSL), defining the valid format of application specific data represented > using XML (DTD, XML Schema, Relax NG), and linking a referencing other XML > documents and fragments (XPath, XLink, XInclude etc.) Good addition if linked to W3C? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
