• From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>
• To: <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:07:43 -0700

I'd like to be debating this on the JDOM list, but I brought the
meta-topic here because there appears to be no there there.
If JDOM is now unmaintained, then I have a bigger problem than the
newline wars that led to XML 1.0 R5.

Leigh.

-----Original Message-----
From: rjelliffe@a... [mailto:rjelliffe@a...] 
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 5:44 PM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Michael Kay; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE:  Whither JDOM?


> In this case, the cited production [84] in XML 1.0 is now deprecated 
> and unused within the REC.  The new productions [4] and [5] are 
> simpler and more inclusive.

And guaranteed to cause your documents to fail when they encounter
existing XML processors.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Whither JDOM?
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>
  • RE: Whither JDOM?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: Whither JDOM?
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>
  • RE: Whither JDOM?
    • From: rjelliffe@a...