• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Klotz, Leigh'" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:24:11 -0000

I'd be very surprised if JDOM cares what it finds in an element name: I
suspect that if the XML parser accepts XML 1.05 style names, then JDOM will
accept them too. But I might be wrong. Do you have any evidence to the
contrary?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klotz, Leigh [mailto:Leigh.Klotz@x...] 
> Sent: 19 March 2009 23:16
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject:  Whither JDOM?
> 
> I sent a note to the jdom-interest list about JDOM and XML 
> 1.0 (5th) production rules for element names, and noticed it 
> didn't make it to the archives.  Then I noticed nothing's new 
> in the archives since January.
> A few quick web searches turned up no tea-leaf reading, and I 
> didn't see any discussion here either.
> 
> So, anybody have ideas what's going on, and if it's nothing 
> good, for the prospects of getting JDOM updated?
> 
> Leigh.
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> 
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by 
> OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To 
> minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
> 
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... List archive: 
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Whither JDOM?
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>

• References:
  • Whither JDOM?
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>