• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• To: rjelliffe@a...
• Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:50:02 -0400

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:44:28AM +1100, rjelliffe@a... wrote:
> 
> > In this case, the cited production [84] in XML 1.0 is now deprecated and
> > unused within the REC.  The new productions [4] and [5] are simpler and
> > more inclusive.
> 
> And guaranteed to cause your documents to fail when they encounter
> existing XML processors.
> 

s/existing/legacy/ since some "existing" processors already
support 5e.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Whither JDOM?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>

• References:
  • Whither JDOM?
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>
  • RE: Whither JDOM?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: Whither JDOM?
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>
  • RE: Whither JDOM?
    • From: rjelliffe@a...