• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Order of attributes
• From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
• Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 02:44:58 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <6d40b41d53bd29cc206e3e39ca0e44dc@r...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

In article <6d40b41d53bd29cc206e3e39ca0e44dc@r...> you write:

>> No, of course not.  An XML editor is the obvious example of an
>> application that can benefit from that information.  But an XML editor
>> does not use an XML document for its semantics.
>
>That's not true... some/many editors are built directly on top of DOM 
>implementations, or something akin to the DOM.

I don't see the contradiction - maybe you misunderstood me.  I didn't
mean that an XML editor doesn't use an XML document, I meant it doesn't
use it *for its semantics*.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Order of attributes
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Order of attributes
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Order of attributes
• Next by Date: Re: Order of attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: Order of attributes
• Next by thread: Re: Order of attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread