• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Order of attributes
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 21:10:27 -0400
• In-reply-to: <20050506221117.88D632A4947@m...>
• References: <20050506221117.88D632A4947@m...>

On May 6, 2005, at 6:11 PM, Richard Tobin wrote:
>> More practically, if a parser guarantees reporting attributes to the
>> application in their order of occurrence in a document, would this be 
>> a
>> reason to declare the parser incompliant with XML 1.0?
>
> No, of course not.  An XML editor is the obvious example of an
> application that can benefit from that information.  But an XML editor
> does not use an XML document for its semantics.

That's not true... some/many editors are built directly on top of DOM 
implementations, or something akin to the DOM.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Order of attributes
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)

• References:
  • Re: Order of attributes
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)

• Prev by Date: Re: Principles of XML design
• Next by Date: Re: Order of attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: Order of attributes
• Next by thread: Re: Order of attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread