• To: XML List Developers <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Order of attributes
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 22:27:30 -0400
• In-reply-to: <20050507014458.3010D2A4B56@m...>
• References: <20050507014458.3010D2A4B56@m...>

On May 6, 2005, at 9:44 PM, Richard Tobin wrote:

> I don't see the contradiction - maybe you misunderstood me.  I didn't
> mean that an XML editor doesn't use an XML document, I meant it doesn't
> use it *for its semantics*.

I'm probably being thick.. but I don't understand this. That's probably 
because I think *semantics* are entirely in the eye of the beholder.

It seems to be that *some* editors might understand *all* of the 
semantics of XML (as I believe you mean it), but augment them with 
constraints/semantics above and beyond those?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Order of attributes
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)

• References:
  • Re: Order of attributes
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)

• Prev by Date: Re: Order of attributes
• Next by Date: Re: Order of attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: Order of attributes
• Next by thread: Re: Order of attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread