• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Inline data typing
• From: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:24:48 -0500
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=NIp6f/cvi6F3U+i4rETzJhNFhmo/4aQc1f/6x3ILgb2piGX17kupbSJ0OzbasDqXZPJmx1vjENSETvzd8aMPMBuS4vbEvDF2LgNKavPn+WCPxOMe3o5Bt0ZXMDX6TZascglvufYZBacjy21mdCFRicEmK8wCrnhspfFjRQ3t/0A=
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10276726D@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10276726D@R...>
• Reply-to: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:21:37 -0800, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...> wrote:

> Looks like you'd have just reinvented xsi:type.

Right, but for instances rather than schemas.  Or are the specs
blessing its use in document instances now?


All the best,


David

-- 
http://www.megginson.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Inline data typing
    • From: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>
  • Re: Inline data typing
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
  • Re: Inline data typing
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Inline data typing
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Inline data typing
• Next by Date: Re: SAXException, checked, buy why?
• Previous by thread: RE: Inline data typing
• Next by thread: Re: Inline data typing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread