• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Inline data typing
• From: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:45:22 -0500
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=f2Qvi/kTz7v2lDzn81E/mB4PFM8NZif6PojRJSn+oAvfbGRm3qE8byvzLF3usCUzBGo2pTLGAh1+s5769ZIh97Vmkjjfq6Y0iPJ7y4zNUJtkPv2aQLh9XLdJh1F+7FBQvpDeXY9uJV0AhN5YP1uwZiDQ+DkLG2A8IGL0JY8prQA=
• In-reply-to: <75cb920c05010506245d761a0a@m...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10276726D@R...> <75cb920c05010506245d761a0a@m...>
• Reply-to: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:24:48 -0500, David Megginson
<david.megginson@g...> wrote:

> Right, but for instances rather than schemas.  Or are the specs
> blessing its use in document instances now?

A list member straightened me out about this point via private e-mail.   Thanks.


David

-- 
http://www.megginson.com/

• References:
  • RE: Inline data typing
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: Inline data typing
    • From: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Inline data typing
• Next by Date: Re: The Airplane Example vs XML 2.0 with data-typing
• Previous by thread: Re: Inline data typing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread