• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Inline data typing
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:38:49 +0100
• In-reply-to: <75cb920c05010506245d761a0a@m...>
• Organization: Dyomedea (http://dyomedea.com)
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10276726D@R...> <75cb920c05010506245d761a0a@m...>

Hi David,

Le mercredi 05 janvier 2005 à 09:24 -0500, David Megginson a écrit :
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:21:37 -0800, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...> wrote:
> 
> > Looks like you'd have just reinvented xsi:type.
> 
> Right, but for instances rather than schemas.  Or are the specs
> blessing its use in document instances now?

What do you mean? 

xsi:type has always be for use in instance documents rather than schemas
(that's why this attribute belongs to a specific namespace)...

My 0.2 ¤

Eric (who doesn't believe that it's such a good idea anyway)

-- 
Lisez-moi sur XMLfr.
                       http://xmlfr.org/index/person/eric+van+der+vlist/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG   ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: Inline data typing
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: Inline data typing
    • From: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
• Next by Date: Re: Inline data typing
• Previous by thread: Re: Inline data typing
• Next by thread: Re: Inline data typing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread