• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Well-formed BinXML
• From: Kevin Jones <kjones@s...>
• Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:08:34 +0000
• Organization: Sarvega Inc
• Reply-to: kjones@s...
• User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

I have been doing some work with a binary encoding of 
something akin to a serialisation of SAX events as 
generated from an XPath object model. I thought it might be 
an interesting exercise to try and quantify the performance 
penalty of applying well-formed constraints to this 
encoding. 

I have a small list of constraints that need to be added 
which are not implicitly guaranteed by this encoding. Just 
wondering if anybody can think of any others I should be 
looking at that would not typically be for free as part of 
this type of binary encoding. 

Only one top-level element
All character data in correct ranges
Names on elements, attributes and pi target are valid
Attribute names are unique over an element
Comments do not contain '--'
PI data does not contain '?>'

If I can get some usefull datapoints out of this I will post 
them to the list.

Thanks,
Kev.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Well-formed BinXML
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • RE: Well-formed BinXML
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Compound Documents? RE: Announcement of the NVDL FCD
• Next by Date: RE: on-the-wire xml ... Even if you're ...
• Previous by thread: RE: Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March
• Next by thread: RE: Well-formed BinXML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread