* Jonathan Robie wrote:
> "Formally address all issues raised about the document since the
> previous step. In practice, once a Working Group wishes to advance to
> Candidate Recommendation or beyond, the Director expects positive
> documentation that issues have been formally addressed (e.g., in an
> issues list that shows their disposition). For earlier stages on the
> Recommendation Track, less formal documentation generally suffices
> (e.g., evidence in an archived mailing list)."
>> I am not sure where you got this rule for members from, maybe you can
>> point me to the relevant section in the operative Process document?
>
>It's quoted above, taken from the link below.
Where does it talk about "employees of member companies" exactly?
- References:
- RE: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Spec or Longhorn?
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
- Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Spec or Longhorn?
- From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
- Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Spec or Longhorn?
- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
- Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Spec or Longhorn?
- From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
- Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Spec or Longhorn?
- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
- Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Spec or Longhorn?
- From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
- Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Spec or Longhorn?
- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
- Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Specor Longhorn?
- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
- Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Spec or Longhorn?
- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
- Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Specor Longhorn?
- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
|