Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
* Jonathan Robie wrote: >> It is, for example, not possible to implement a spec from the spec if >> two parts of the specification contradict each other. The specification >> would need to be changed in order to implement it. > >Right. Every W3C specification tells you the name of a mailing list to >which you should send this kind of feedback. We are required to respond >to this feedback (unless it comes from employees of member companies, >when it can be handled more informally). Working Groups are not required to formally address such issues, they are not required to respond in a timely manner, and just responding to reviewers does not solve the problem as a response does not change the specification in any way. And that there is such a requirement does not mean that Working Groups actually do it. There thus seems to be room for improvement... I am not sure where you got this rule for members from, maybe you can point me to the relevant section in the operative Process document?
|
