Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 08:05, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > Working Groups are not required to formally address such issues, they > are not required to respond in a timely manner, and just responding to > reviewers does not solve the problem as a response does not change the > specification in any way. And that there is such a requirement does not > mean that Working Groups actually do it. There thus seems to be room > for improvement... > > I am not sure where you got this rule for members from, maybe you can > point me to the relevant section in the operative Process document? http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/policies.html#formal-address Perhaps the requirement to 'formally address' those issues? A bit fluffy, but the XSL WG can't be accused of skipping this one. What makes me chuckle is the fact that the requirement on which a WD is based is open to change, is not publicly reviewed and can be changed by the WG! Requirements creep is one thing, .... -- Regards DaveP. XSLT&Docbook FAQ http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl
|
