• To: <davep@d...>,"'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@g...>
• Subject: RE: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Specor Longhorn?
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:45:19 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <1098000753.2529.12.camel@homer>
• Thread-index: AcS0IFiAs5sgUUB8SLuptk4vZMJzmQAR2nxg

> What makes me chuckle is the fact that the requirement on which
> a WD is based is open to change, is not publicly reviewed
> and can be changed by the WG!

Requirements documents are normally published for review, though I'm not
enough of a process lawyer to go looking in the process document to see what
it says on the matter. Certainly the requirements documents for
XSLT/XPath/XQuery were published for review, and they have proved very
stable. 

The OP complained that the specs were taking too long to finish, and I
replied that this is in good measure a consequence of the fact that the
process is very open. If you want the specs more quickly, making the process
more open will not help.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery SpecorLonghorn?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Specor Longhorn?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>

• Prev by Date: UPA and schema handling
• Next by Date: Re: UPA and schema handling
• Previous by thread: Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery Specor Longhorn?
• Next by thread: Re: Which Will Be Released First, the W3C's XQuery SpecorLonghorn?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread