Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Paul Sumner Downey wrote: >>The "OWL for OWL" (as it has been called) does, however, give >>a flavor of what OWL is and how OWL relates to RDF. >> >> > >cool stuff and that certainly is eating your own bird-food. >(BTW why isn't it WOL as in A.A.Milne?) > > It is: "Web Ontology Language" >is there any work (or is it feasible) to generating test cases >from an OWL version of a spec ? > > Not that I'm aware of, sounds a mighty good idea. I am planning to explore down a nearby path a little by echoing the Atom syndication format in OWL (and hopefully the service API in OWL-S) - mostly done [1] - then trying to build a "Semantic Validator". In other words, take the OWL model + an off-the-shelf reasoner + test assertions + Atom instance data (translated to RDF/XML via XSLT) - stir it all up, and see if it's consistent. Cheers, Danny. [1] http://semtext.org/atom/ -- Raw http://dannyayers.com
|
