• To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>,"Mark Baker" <distobj@a...>
• Subject: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
• From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:46:30 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <40D32856.4010503@o...>

> The "OWL for OWL" (as it has been called) does, however, give 
> a flavor of what OWL is and how OWL relates to RDF.

cool stuff and that certainly is eating your own bird-food. 
(BTW why isn't it WOL as in A.A.Milne?)

is there any work (or is it feasible) to generating test cases 
from an OWL version of a spec ?

Paul

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny666@v...>
  • Re: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorothe
• Next by Date: Re: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
• Previous by thread: Re: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
• Next by thread: Re: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread