[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 01:37:26PM -0400, Jonathan Borden wrote: > >I don't know if those documents capture everything they could or not, > >but at least some relationships between the specs are declared. > > > For various reasons it is not possible to "capture everything" in OWL Hence "capture everything *they could*". I'm fully aware of the expressiveness limitations, meaning that I know they exist. I just couldn't tell you what they are. 8-) > using *only* RDF/Schema. The way that OWL is actually defined as an > extension language of RDF is via the respective model theories. The "OWL > for OWL" (as it has been called) does, however, give a flavor of what > OWL is and how OWL relates to RDF. Yup, thanks for confirming. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Seeking work on large scale application/data integration projects and/or the enabling infrastructure for same.
|

Cart



