• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>,"'Rick Marshall'" <rjm@z...>
• Subject: RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
• From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:26:14 +0100
• Cc: "'Miles Sabin'" <miles@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F91F@h...>

Len wrote:
> FutureProof: At the end of the automation era, the only 
> people left with jobs were technical writers.  Writing 
> universally acceptable sentences proved to be the one 
> truly intractable problem.

Maybe the W3C should eat its own dog food and write up
their specs in OWL. Believe it or not i'm being serious!

Paul

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Extreme Late-breaking Call for Participation
• Next by Date: RE: Triplets on the Internet
• Previous by thread: RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
• Next by thread: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread