• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
• From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:26:01 -0400
• In-reply-to: <AKEALCBHGNKMENPPPGFFIEJJDCAA.Paul.Downey@w...>
• References: <AKEALCBHGNKMENPPPGFFIEJJDCAA.Paul.Downey@w...>

On Jun 17, 2004, at 5:26 PM, Paul Sumner Downey wrote:
>
> Maybe the W3C should eat its own dog food and write up
> their specs in OWL. Believe it or not i'm being serious!
>
For what  it's worth, the Web Services Architecture final WG note 
included an OWL formalization of what we were trying to say about web 
services  concepts / relationships. 
  

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorothe
    • From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>

• References:
  • RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
    • From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Inheritance in XML
• Next by Date: RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
• Previous by thread: RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
• Next by thread: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorothe
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread