• To: <danny666@v...>
• Subject: RE: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
• From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>
• Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:33:50 +0100
• Cc: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>,"Mark Baker" <distobj@a...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <40D4903B.60909@v...>

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Ayers [mailto:danny666@v...]
Sent: 19 June 2004 20:13
To: Paul Sumner Downey
Cc: Jonathan Borden; Mark Baker; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: 
Meta-somethingorother


Paul Sumner Downey wrote:

>>The "OWL for OWL" (as it has been called) does, however, give
>>a flavor of what OWL is and how OWL relates to RDF.
>>
>>
>
>cool stuff and that certainly is eating your own bird-food.
>(BTW why isn't it WOL as in A.A.Milne?)
>
Danny Ayers wrote:
> I am planning to explore down a nearby path a little by echoing the Atom
> syndication format in OWL (and hopefully the service API in OWL-S) -
> mostly done [1] - then trying to build a "Semantic Validator". In other
> words, take the OWL model + an off-the-shelf reasoner + test assertions
> + Atom instance data (translated to RDF/XML via XSLT) - stir it all up,
> and see if it's consistent.
> [1] http://semtext.org/atom/

good stuff, i'm going to study this carefully!

another interesting project could be to look at mapping Z to and from OWL ..

Paul

• References:
  • Re: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny666@v...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• Next by Date: Re: Inheritance in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother
• Next by thread: RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread