Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > ... > > So I guess what I'm saying is you're right. There's no difference > between sending a serialized XML DOM across RMI and shipping some > other "binary" XML format. they're both incredibly fragile things that > will break and probably sooner rather than later. You know, like Jpeg, Tiff/Group4, Word documents (!), PowerPoint, zip files, tar/cpio, jar files, gziped HTML, etc. When you get a corrupted XML document, you can always magically recover just the right missing tags and information? Wow, where is that method in the spec? We're realistically talking about bugs or deficiencies in code, configuration, mismatch between applications, etc., not 'fragile things that break' from any perspective but schema co-evolution, configuration management, and programmer error, isn't that right? You can add forward error correction, b64 or quoted text encoding, and other methods to prevent corruption, but the only cure for user/programmer/operator error is early error detection and clear warning. When these have already been taken care of, through earlier testing in once sense or another, or other methods, it is not an issue. sdw -- swilliams@h... http://www.hpti.com Pers: sdw@l... http://sdw.st Stephen D. Williams 703-724-0118W 703-995-0407Fax 20147-4622 AIM: sdw
|
