• To: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Subject: Re: xml editors
• From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@w...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:29:45 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20040415000111.GE7829@w...>
• References: <1081934257.5334.12.camel@z...> <407D97D1.2040301@w...> <20040415000111.GE7829@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Liam Quin wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 09:58:09PM +0200, Sjoerd Visscher wrote:
> 
>>Although the other suggested editors will work, Xopus is the *only* 
>>editor that lets you use your existing publishing xslts for wysiwyg 
>>editing. Other editors use the limited possibilities of CSS or require 
>>you to create a proprietary transformation for wysiwyg editing.
> 
> 
> Doesn't Serna do this too?

Yes. Xopus and Serna both use XSLT. But Xopus expects the ouput to be 
HTML or XML styled with CSS where Serna expects XSL-FO.
Rick mentioned that the documents are published on an intranet, so I 
assumed he had XSLT documents that generate HTML.

If you puslish on paper, use Serna. If you publish on the web, use Xopus.

-- 
Sjoerd Visscher
http://w3future.com/weblog/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• References:
  • xml editors
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@w...>
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fast text output from SAX?
• Next by Date: RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Previous by thread: Re: xml editors
• Next by thread: Re: xml editors
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread