• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
• From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:18:26 -0400 (EDT)

Hello,

  I've posted the XUL Compact Syntax Study online that
explores four non-XML syntax alternatives (that is, C
style, Python style, Lisp style, Pascal style) hoping
to make the XUL syntax more compact and more accesible
to newcomers who mighty shy away from the "complexity"
of XML.

 Let us know what you think. Is XML too hard for mere
mortals? Are the alternative syntax styles any better?

  More @ http://xul.sourceforge.net/compact.html

    - Gerald

-------------------
Gerald Bauer
Open XUL Alliance - A Rich Internet For Everyone |
http://xul.sourceforge.net  

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
    • From: Jim Rankin <jimbokun_lists@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XMLBinary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Next by Date: Re: Fast text output from SAX?
• Previous by thread: process response xml format
• Next by thread: Re: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread