• To: xml-dev@l... DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: WS-Emperor naked?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:04:00 -0800

Would anyone here like to argue that the list found in

  http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/04/01/WS-Mumble

is coherent, or sensible, or viable, or generally that the parrot is 
not dead?

  -Tim

smime.p7s

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...>
  • RE: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>
  • Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny666@v...>
  • RE: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
  • RE: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
  • Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: Jim Rankin <jimbokun_lists@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Next by Date: RE: WS-Emperor naked?
• Previous by thread: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Next by thread: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread