• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• From: Jim Rankin <jimbokun_lists@m...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:22:12 -0500
• Cc: "xml-dev@l... DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <E1FB3A8E-84E0-11D8-ABCB-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• References: <E1FB3A8E-84E0-11D8-ABCB-000A95A51C9E@t...>

Would anyone here like to argue that the list found in

http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/04/01/WS-Mumble

is coherent, or sensible, or viable, or generally that the parrot is not dead?

-Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>

• References:
  • WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: XSD "simpleType" validation for strings
• Next by Date: RE: How to make tables using XSL
• Previous by thread: WS-Emperor naked?
• Next by thread: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread