• To: 'Tim Bray' <tbray@t...>, "xml-dev@l... DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: WS-Emperor naked?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 14:09:11 -0600

It might be.  How would one know?  It is likely 
that every one of the OASIS teams out there really 
believes in their project.  

It is waaaay too easy to form a working 
group.  In the recent reorg of the W3DC, we've 
been looking into that problem.

Who owns the WS problem?

len


From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]

Would anyone here like to argue that the list found in

  http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/04/01/WS-Mumble

is coherent, or sensible, or viable, or generally that the parrot is 
not dead?

  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: WS-Emperor naked?
• Next by Date: XSD "simpleType" validation for strings
• Previous by thread: WS-Emperor naked?
• Next by thread: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread