• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: DTD parser in c#
• From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:17:39 -0500
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F53C@h...>

> It won't be a trademark; it could be a conformance mark, 
> and you could obligate its use through a conformance 
> suite (pass the test and you get to use the mark).

I am not going to obligate anyone. ;-)
 
> Unfortunately, unless you have a named entity to 
> register it, it won't have a firm status and 
> there is no obligation to respect it.

Fine with me as well.

> Anything you use as a prefix there (openSource, org, etc) 
> will have a competitor for its use.  That is all that Dare 
> is illustrating by example. 

As I consider this a community project - if the community
wants to use it, then it will. If they don't like it,
then the naming conflicts won't matter.

Karl

• References:
  • RE: DTD parser in c#
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: DTD parser in c#
• Next by Date: RE: DTD parser in c#
• Previous by thread: RE: DTD parser in c#
• Next by thread: RE: DTD parser in c#
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread