• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: DTD parser in c#
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:59:09 -0600

It won't be a trademark; it could be a conformance mark, 
and you could obligate its use through a conformance 
suite (pass the test and you get to use the mark).

Unfortunately, unless you have a named entity to 
register it, it won't have a firm status and 
there is no obligation to respect it.

Anything you use as a prefix there (openSource, org, etc) 
will have a competitor for its use.  That is all that Dare 
is illustrating by example. 

Single source?  Really?

len

Standards:  an ethical way for big companies to 
compete with each other until all competitors but 
one withdraw from the market; proprietary is faster 
but the whining is unbearable.


From: Karl Waclawek [mailto:karl@w...]

Are they already owned by someone, or trademarked?

So, the namespaces would be: OpenSource.System.Xml.Sax, etc.
Or, even better - just read Jeff's message - Org.Xml.Sax or
Org.System.Xml.Sax.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DTD parser in c#
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTD parser in c#
• Next by Date: Re: DTD parser in c#
• Previous by thread: Re: DTD parser in c#
• Next by thread: Re: DTD parser in c#
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread