Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 16:52, Irene Polikoff wrote: > Some application domains care to make a difference between husbands and > wifes, others do not - in these cases the use of a spouse is more > appropriate. My point was that there are technical mechanisms in OWL > that allow us to implement what Liam wanted to do, and what Pedro wanted > to. How exactly, depends on the need of the application and I have no > interest in arguing over it. Ouch! I never imagined the growing threads over this topic issue. Let me say now that the sample I used was just a simplified and dummy sample of my real case, which has nothing about husband and wifes :-) Now, the discussion has clarified me about the importance of the definition schema, and believe me that I abandoned the theory of trying to validate the most as possible with the schema rules. I agree that the schema should be simple, and the semantics validations should be done post-schema validation. I mean, I'll try to use schematron (for instance) to do the post semantics validations and keep my schema definition stable and simple. Thanks, Pedro Salazar -- -PS
|
