• To: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Subject: Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
• From: Alan <alan-xml-dev@e...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:03:12 -0500
• Cc: 'XML DEV' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <FA53B593-6941-11D8-891A-000A95CCC59E@x...>
• Mail-followup-to: mc@x...,xml-dev@l...
• References: <001701c3fd49$5d3a5610$0201a8c0@IRENE> <403F6A0E.4F038C3D@b...><FA53B593-6941-11D8-891A-000A95CCC59E@x...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Michael Champion <mc@x...> [2004-02-27 16:31]:
> 
> On Feb 27, 2004, at 11:02 AM, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> >Irene Polikoff wrote:
> >[snip]
> >>What you are bringing up is that in some countries a husband may be 
> >>also a male.
> >
> >Sorry to be picky, but wouldn't this be in all countries (a "husband" 
> >is
> >never female)? :)
> >
> 
> Do you *know* that Rosie O'Donnell's new spouse does not consider her a 
> "husband"? <duck>  Somebody out there (presumably in California) is 
> going to enter "husband" to describe a woman before long, it's going to 
> violate constraints built into software, and some poor geek is going to 
> have to take political heat for it.  I don't want to be in that 
> position.

They are entering it right now in order to produce valid marriage
    certificates in California.

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20040219-123003-6956r.htm

    Secretary of California Health and Human Services, Kim Balshe is
    taking advantage of "busines" logic to reject gay marriages.

-- 
Alan / alan@e... / http://engrm.com/
    aim/yim: alanengrm - icq: 228631855 - msn: alanengrm@h...

• References:
  • RE: semantics in schema (xsd)
    • From: "Irene Polikoff" <Irene@t...>
  • Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Next by Date: RE: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Previous by thread: Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Next by thread: RE: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread