• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
• From: "Bryce K. Nielsen" <bryce@s...>
• Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:41:24 -0700
• References: <1077740939.13692.97.camel@v...>

In a way it's possible. May not be as clean as you'd like, but you can
always create a "malehuman" type and a "femalehuman" type, then through
choice or substitution groups limit the subelements.

Bryce K. Nielsen
SysOnyx, Inc. (www.sysonyx.com)
Makers of xmlHack, The Simple XML Editor
http://www.sysonyx.com/products/xmlhack

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• References:
  • semantics in schema (xsd)
    • From: Pedro Salazar <pedro-b-salazar@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Next by Date: Where things stand with SAX
• Previous by thread: RE: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Next by thread: Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread