• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 20:47:10 -0500
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D101178CFC@R...>

dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo) writes:
>>On the bright side, they also seem to have discarded W3C XML Schema in
>>favor of WinFS, probably because there wasn't a "straightforward way
>>to adapt those technologies to Microsoft's purpose."
>
>Sorry to disappoint you. 

Heck, then you get the slings and arrows of outrageous WXS plus a WinFS
that looks, well, like it kind of does RDF-ish things without the URIs
blotting out the sun.

Suddenly, I'm feeling hopeful that this won't go far.  That's hardly
disappointing!  Good luck.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Next by Date: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Previous by thread: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Next by thread: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread