• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:43:33 -0800
• Thread-index: AcOjHO+6noyGDlYGT6eHEB925jdTkQAEmFXQ
• Thread-topic: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:30 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE:  Why I Like Longhorn and XAML

>On the bright side, they also seem to have discarded W3C XML Schema in
favor of WinFS, probably because there wasn't a "straightforward way to
adapt those technologies to Microsoft's purpose."

http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=d0b398f5-9343-4f91
-8e1c-340c5a6669e2 

Sorry to disappoint you. 

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
To err is human, to forgive is against department policy.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Next by Date: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Previous by thread: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Next by thread: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread