• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Subject: Re: NEL in XML 1.1
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:15:57 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200310221247.NAA12984@p...>
• References: <20031021220352.GI20875@s...> <200310212215.XAA00342@e3000> <20031022110554.GE13880@m...> <200310221247.NAA12984@p...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

David Carlisle scripsit:

> oops. So it's worse than I thought, not only is it covering up the
> symptoms of a bad change it's introducing yet another class of documents
> that become non well formed on changing teh version number.

So file a complaint with xml-editor@w... against the PR version
(after you've read it, of course).

-- 
Business before pleasure, if not too bloomering long before.
        --Nicholas van Rijn
                John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
                        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan  http://www.reutershealth.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: NEL in XML 1.1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • NEL in XML 1.1
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Previous by thread: NEL in XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: NEL in XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread