• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Subject: Re: UTF-8+names
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:03:52 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200310211756.SAA27350@e3000>
• References: <20031020170656.GB3723@m...> <200310211756.SAA27350@e3000>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

David Carlisle scripsit:

> Given that 1.1 gratuitously changed the XML white space rules to cope
> with something that _should_ have been done as an encoding issue,

No, it shouldn't.  And it wasn't gratuitous.  It was a matter of justice.
If the decision had been taken not to unify CR, LF, and CR+LF, the
omitted community would have been screaming.  NEL is not CR or LF.

-- 
A rabbi whose congregation doesn't want         John Cowan
to drive him out of town isn't a rabbi,         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and a rabbi who lets them do it                 jcowan@r...
isn't a man.    --Jewish saying                 http://www.reutershealth.com

• References:
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Next by Date: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Previous by thread: re: Namespace entity names Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by thread: Re: UTF-8+names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread