Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
In article <p06002008bbbc32627620@[192.168.254.4]> you write: >It might affect people who are wrapping to a specific line length, >especially if they have a longish encoding name. If you can show a single real document that this applies to, I'll take it more seriously. >However, I don't see the benefit of doing it in 1.1 since parsers >already have the code to handle line broken XML declarations. The problem is that you don't know which characters are line breaks until you've read the version number. >Making >an additional distinction between 1.0 and 1.1 will just make parsers >a little harder to write since they'll need to special case this >depending on version. The change was based on implementor feedback, in particular a comment from me, though I only suggested outlawing the new line end characters. >In either case, I assume you're planning to go back to last call >then? I don't see anything about this in the candidate recommendation. The CR period is for implementation feedback. Since it affects no existing (i.e. 1.0) documents, I can't see any need to go back to last call. -- Richard
|
