• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: RelaxNG question
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 23:12:30 +0100
• Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D171A9BA@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D171A9BA@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

>>No doubt. In RNG's case, I believe you can't negate the class 
>>of non-namespaced  names. I'm trying to think why you'd want 
>>that facility.
> 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#soapbody

I read the section and saw nothing that required the negation of 
non-namespaced names. Unless you're looking to overconstrain SOAP, 
perhaps you can explain your thinking, or get back on topic.

Bill de hÓra

-- 
Technical Architect
Propylon
http://www.propylon.com

• References:
  • RE: RelaxNG question
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RelaxNG question
• Next by Date: RE: RelaxNG question
• Previous by thread: RE: RelaxNG question
• Next by thread: RE: RelaxNG question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread