Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:bill.dehora@p...] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:13 PM > To: Dare Obasanjo > Cc: Tim Bray; XML Dev > Subject: Re: RelaxNG question > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#soapbody > > I read the section and saw nothing that required the negation > of non-namespaced names. Unless you're looking to > overconstrain SOAP, perhaps you can explain your thinking, or > get back on topic. "All child element information items of the SOAP Body element information item: SHOULD have a [namespace name] property which has a value, that is the name of the element SHOULD be namespace qualified." Of course, nothing stops you from being pedantic and arguing that a SHOULD is not a requirement. There is also http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123/#section-attribute-node which may require banning attributes without a namespace name. Anyway the point is that there are XML vocabularies that have this characteristic which unfortunately cannot be described by any of the popular XML schema languages. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM People can be divided into two types: those who still possess a fierce hunting instinct and those who pay to park. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|
