• To: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Subject: RE: RelaxNG question
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:55:54 -0700
• Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>,"XML Dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcNl0yPxGGENA3d4TJmm45y1zZZKQgAAChJg
• Thread-topic: RelaxNG question

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:bill.dehora@p...] 
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 2:53 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: Tim Bray; XML Dev
> Subject: Re:  RelaxNG question
> 
> 
> No doubt. In RNG's case, I believe you can't negate the class 
> of non-namespaced  names. I'm trying to think why you'd want 
> that facility.

http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#soapbody

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
People can be divided into two types: those who still possess a fierce hunting instinct and those who pay to park.                                                       

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RelaxNG question
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RelaxNG question
• Next by Date: Re: RelaxNG question
• Previous by thread: Re: RelaxNG question
• Next by thread: Re: RelaxNG question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread