Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Bob Foster writes: > > Would an xml-technology specific list be any real use to anyone? > > In case anyone doesn't know, there is an xml-technology specific > newsgroup: comp.text.xml. It seems of real use to people who are, > e.g., having trouble using XML Schema or DTDs, and the "Is XML a > bagel or a database?" kind of question usually draws a constructive > response. I think that the problem for some people is that xml-dev often becomes xml-phi. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but the set of people who like to build software and the set of people who like to debate abstract issues intercept only to a small extent. I doubt that an xml-phi list would prove all that popular, though, since the philosophers need an audience other than each-other. All the best, David -- David Megginson, david@m..., http://www.megginson.com/
|
