• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
• From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:13:18 +0200
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r02000000-1026-67CEB74DBD3F11D7A0870003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• Reply-to: <danny666@v...>

> Maybe the world needs an "xml-utterly-practical" list?  You're hardly
> the first person I've heard with this complaint.  I doubt I'd join it,
> but that would probably make the utterly-practical folks cheer anyway.

Would an xml-technology specific list be any real use to anyone? There are
other lists for individual things like xsl, java+xml etc. I suspect a
literal "xml-dev" would be too widely scoped. This list on the other hand
has the groove left by those six years of posts to keep it on track...

> It's a technology, it's a medium, it's interesting.  As technologies go,
> this one has a lot of depth, and not just because the specs have grown
> enormous.

Yup.

Cheers,
Danny.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
  • Re: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice:inline node editing, or not?)
    • From: Jay Vaughan <jv@a...>

• References:
  • Re: Advice: inline node editing, or not?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Advice: inline node editing, or not?
• Next by Date: Re: Advice: inline node editing, or not?
• Previous by thread: Re: Advice: inline node editing, or not?
• Next by thread: Re: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice:inline node editing, or not?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread