• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
• From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:12:31 -0500
• References: <BKELLDAGKABIOCHDFDBPOEEGDHAA.danny666@v...>

> Would an xml-technology specific list be any real use to anyone?

In case anyone doesn't know, there is an xml-technology specific newsgroup:
comp.text.xml. It seems of real use to people who are, e.g., having trouble
using XML Schema or DTDs, and the "Is XML a bagel or a database?" kind of
question  usually draws a constructive response.

Bob Foster

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>

• Prev by Date: RE: political blather (WAS Re: Advice: inline node edit ing, or not?)
• Next by Date: Re: No Divine Right to a Reply (Was: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
• Previous by thread: RE: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
• Next by thread: Re: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread