• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>
• Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 10:30:34 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030708100540.023f4640@s...>

Hi Simon

Simon said:
Technically, both sides have some cool stuff.  Politically, this has been a 
disaster from the outset.

Didier replies:
I totally agree with that. Can I add to this that its really bad Microsoft
didn't added the Table object to its CSS implementation and that the W3C WG
never incorporated behaviors, an excellent idea brought by Microsoft. CSS
seems to be the poor guy in an undeveloped tech-land. More than that, this
land is leaded by deaf people.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
http://didier-martin.com

• References:
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by Date: Re: mathml Content question
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread